瑞星卡卡安全论坛技术交流区系统软件 中国的悲哀:国产杀软不长进!!!

12   1  /  2  页   跳转

中国的悲哀:国产杀软不长进!!!

中国的悲哀:国产杀软不长进!!!

最近到处都在说卡巴误杀,卡巴怎么样怎么样。就我个人来说,瑞星和卡巴以及诺盾这些都用过。只有很简单的一些话:为什么在中国,国产杀软比不上国外的?不是国外的杀软怎么炒作之类的。所有的网民自己心里都清楚,国产杀软说得好听点,功能还将就,说得不好听点,就是垃圾。每次出了什么问题总是说国外某个杀软怎么怎么。而有没有自己考虑过本身问题?不是说别的,自己都不争气,怪别人有屁用,现在居然更可笑,说什么卡巴蔑视中国。大家说可不可笑啊。哈哈,笑死我了!~~~~~
    瑞星啊。。。。。。你要不是国产杀软,你要不是有公安部在给你顶着,你算个铲铲,可能连江民都比不上吧~~~自己反省一下吧~~~唉~~~
    我这把4月的最新国外评测发出来,大家看看,看瑞星排到哪个地方了。还好一天到晚说别个闲话,有说这闲话的功夫,还不如自己加把劲,提高一下~~~~


23 April-10 May 2007 (NEW!!!)

•    The test was made on 23 April-10 May 2007, using Windows XP Professional SP2 on a P4 3000 Mhz, 1024MB DDRAM.
•    All programs tested had the latest versions, upgrades and updates and they were tested using their full scanning capabilities e.g. heuristics, full scan etc.
•    The default settings of each program were not used, in order for each program to achieve its maximum detection rate. Because of this, there is a possibility for the tested programs to detect a few false positives.
•    All programs were updated on 22 April 2007, between 10.00AM and 13.00PM GMT.
•    The 174770 virus samples were chosen using VS2000 according to Kaspersky, F-Prot, Nod32, Dr.Web, BitDefender and McAfee antivirus programs. Each virus sample was unique by virus name, meaning that AT LEAST 1 antivirus program detected it as a new virus.
•    ALL virus samples were unpacked and the only samples that were kept were the ones that were packed using external-dos-packers (that means not winzip, winrar, winace etc).
•    The virus samples had the correct file extension using a special program (Renexts) and were unique, according to checksum32 filesize.
•    Most "fake" virus samples were removed, as well as "garbage" files.
•    The programs MKS_VIR , PER and IPArmor were not tested because there was no english demo version available.
•    The programs Anti-Hacker Expert , Command , Extendia AVK , GDATA AVK , BOClean , UNA , VET and Freedom were not tested because there was no demo version available.
•    Thorough mode was not used in VBA32 due to extremely slow scan process.
•    A-Squared Anti-Malware and eTrust PestPatrol are anti-trojan/anti-spyware programs, not antivirus programs
•    F-Prot was tested using its command line scanner (options /adware /applications /report /streams /maxdepth=4 /heurlevel=4) because its GUI kept crashing.
•    Windows Live OneCare, BKAV, PC Tools kept crashing while scanning the samples.
•    TheShield uses the exact same engine as VirobotExpert.
•    Avira uses the exact same engine as AntiVir.
•    Fire uses the exact same engine as Solo.
•    MKS_VIR uses the exact same engine as ArcaVir.
•    VirusBuster uses the exact same engine as Vexira.
•    BullGuard uses the exact same engine as BitDefender free edition.
•    Avast Professional uses the exact same engine as Avast free edition.
•    AVG Anti-Malware uses the exact same engine as AVG Antivirus free edition plus the Ewido scan engine, so it has better detection than AVG Antivirus free edition. (More information here http://www.grisoft.com/doc/products-comparison-home-and-office/us/crp/0)
•    A-squared Anti-Malware Professional uses the exact same engine as A-squared free edition.
•    InVircible did not include a "typical" scanner-function and could not be tested.
•    V-Catch checks only mail accounts and could not be tested.
•    DOS-Based scanners were not tested.
The following file types were used.
SH, ELF, COM, EXE, PL, BAT, PRC, DOC, XLS, BIN, MDB, IMG, PPT, VBS, MSG, VBA, OLE, HTM, INI, SMM, TD0, REG, CLASS, HTA, JS, VI_, URL, PHP, WMF, HLP, XML, SCR, PIF, SHS, WBT, CSC, MAC, DAT, CLS, STI, INF, HQX, XMI, SIT.
The virus samples were divided into these categories, according to the type of the virus :
•    File = BeOS, FreeBSD, Linux, Mac, Palm, OS2, Unix, BinaryImage, BAS viruses, MenuetOS.
•    MS-DOS = MS-DOS viruses.
•    Windows = Win.*.* viruses.
•    Macro = Macro, Multi and Formula viruses.
•    Malware = Adware, DoS, Constructors, Exploit, Flooders, Nukers, Sniffers, SpamTools, Spoofers, Virus Construction Tools, Droppers, PolyEngines.
•    Script = ABAP, BAT, Corel, HTML, Java, Scripts, MSH, VBS, WBS, Worms, PHP, Perl, Ruby viruses.
•    Trojans-Backdoors = Trojan and Backdoor viruses.
Rank
1. Kaspersky version 7.0.0.43 beta - 99.23%
2. Kaspersky version 6.0.2.614 - 99.13%
3. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.308 - 99.13%
4. ZoneAlarm with KAV Antivirus version 7.0.337.000 - 99.13%
5. F-Secure 2007 version 7.01.128 - 98.56%
6. BitDefender Professional version 10 - 97.70%
7. BullGuard version 7.0.0.23 - 96.59%
8. Ashampoo version 1.30 - 95.80%
9. AntiVir version 7.03.01.53 Classic - 95.08%
10. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 94.43%
11. Nod32 version 2.70.32 - 94.00%
12. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 93.27%
13. Avast Professional version 4.7.986 - 92.82%
14. AVG Anti-Malware version 7.5.465 - 92.14%
15. F-Prot 苇魏未慰蟽畏 6.0.6.4 - 91.35%
16. McAfee Enterprise version 8.5.0i+AntiSpyware module - 90.65%
17. Panda 2007 version 2.01.00 - 90.06%
18. Norman version 5.90.37 - 88.47%
19. ArcaVir 2007 - 88.24%
20. McAfee version 11.0.213 - 86.13%
21. Norton Professional 2007 - 86.08%
22. Rising AV version 19.19.42 - 85.46%
23. Dr. Web version 4.33.2 - 85.09%
24. Trend Micro Internet Security 2007 version 15.00.1450 - 84.96%
25. Iolo version 1.1.8 - 83.35%
26. Virus Chaser version 5.0a - 79.51%
27. VBA32 version 3.11.4 - 77.66%
28. Sophos Sweep version 6.5.1 - 69.79%
29. ViRobot Expert version 5.0 - 69.53%
30. Antiy Ghostbusters version 5.2.1 - 65.95%
31. Zondex Guard version 5.4.2 - 63.79%
32. Vexira 2006 version 5.002.62 - 60.07%
33. V3 Internet Security version 2007.04.21.00 - 55.09%
34. Comodo version 2.0.12.47 beta - 53.94%
35. Comodo version 1.1.0.3 - 53.39%
36. A-Squared Anti-Malware version 2.1 - 52.69%
37. Ikarus version 5.19 - 50.56%
38. Digital Patrol version 5.00.37 - 49.80%
39. ClamWin version 0.90.1 - 47.95%
40. Quick Heal version 9.00 - 38.64%
41. Solo version 5.1 build 5.7.3 - 34.52%
42. Protector Plus version 8.0.A02 - 33.13%
43. PcClear version 1.0.4.3 - 27.14%
44. AntiTrojan Shield version 2.1.0.14 - 20.25%
45. PC Door Guard version 4.2.0.35- 19.95%
46. Trojan Hunter version 4.6.930 - 19.20%
47. VirIT version 6.1.75 - 18.78%
48. E-Trust PestPatrol version 8.0.0.6 - 11.80%
49. Trojan Remover version 6.6.0 - 10.44%
50. The Cleaner version 4.2.4319 - 7.26%
51. True Sword version 4.2 - 2.20%
52. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 1.43%
53. Abacre version 1.4 - 0.00%

此评测连接地址:http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/default.asp?id=85&mnu=85
最后编辑2007-05-27 22:24:23.437000000
分享到:
gototop
 

后面的%是什么意思呢??
他们确实不长进
瑞星变成这样,我们这些用户也不想啊,但是瑞星的今天,确实让我们很担心,瑞星的老技术人员、核心技术人员大都跳槽了,而瑞星又是很有实力的杀软,真是很担心网络的前景呢,我提议:所有用户打 (010)82678800[瑞星客服热线,要转人工台] 反映情况,看瑞星怎么对用户交代!!!!
gototop
 

网页找不到啊?!!
gototop
 

那个网站好像要用户名才能进去了
gototop
 

22. Rising AV version 19.19.42 - 85.46%
瑞星能派到22?
gototop
 

http://publish.it168.com/2007/0131/20070131002303.shtml
熊猫烧香的考验!看看瑞星的表现
gototop
 

瑞星能排到22位,已经让我很惊讶了!
gototop
 

我国许多产业都在进步,所以有联想收购IBM的发展,国产杀软不是不长进,是许多人不乐观,以为自己的就不如人家的,木没办法。
gototop
 

看看论坛里基本都是瑞星用户在求助。瑞星都那么好了,怎么中毒的机子那么多?自己不如意,还攻击别人,这就是瑞星的悲哀~~~··不要把国产杀毒软件看作是神~特别是国产的瑞星~~
gototop
 

白痴一个,谁说国产的不长进,那些排名有何用,要根具用户的使用来看,你可以到处调查调查,使用杀软最多的是哪一款,不还是瑞星,国外的可有有一个象样的,卡巴用的人相对多一些,不还是到出放盗版所制,有几个用正版的。无怪乎被评为10大盗版之一。
gototop
 
12   1  /  2  页   跳转
页面顶部
Powered by Discuz!NT